Louboutin's lawyers are going back to Judge Marrero today to argue for their trademark.
While there are many people discussing this case, I have not seen or heard of anyone else discussing the trademark case Louboutin lost, wherein Louboutin had to cease production and sale of blue soled shoes. I am almost convincing myself that this trademark infringement case did not exist. Do you know this case? I also think it may have been in Europe...?
It is silly to think that Louboutin fans are not going to stray to other shoes simply because the shoes also have red outsoles. If I were Louboutin, I would twist color not being a possible trademarked for use on an outsole into bringing back blue-bottomed shoes for use as "something blue" in weddings. Judge Marrero's decision is the perfect opening for Louboutin to attack the potential blue sole loving market! Do you agree with me or do you want Louboutin's trademark upheld?